How Long is the Process?If you are in poor health, as is often the case in asbestos-related medical situations, the entire legal process can be expedited. If there is no urgency, the process could take several months or longer. In either case, the defendant probably will try to drag out the process. Your attorney will work to resolve your case as quickly as possible, handling each step so you can focus on your health and spend time with your loved ones.
Do I Need to Travel?
The location where you file can affect the length of the case process. Your attorney will help you choose the most favorable court for your case. It may be necessary to file outside the state where you live. You will not need to travel because your mesothelioma attorney will handle the entire case process and travel to you when necessary.
Filing a Mesothelioma Lawsuit After Death
If a mesothelioma patient files a lawsuit but passes away before it's resolved, their loved ones may be able to step in as plaintiffs. In some cases, families file their own wrongful death lawsuits, which can help provide compensation to assist with medical bills, funeral expenses and loss of income. In other cases, loved ones may also obtain monetary awards for their emotional suffering.
It's important to keep in mind that time is of the essence in these types of situations. In most states, you usually have 12 to 24 months after your loved one has died from asbestos exposure.
Once you file your claim, be prepared for defendants to deny all fault for your medical condition. They may allege that:
- Smoking, drinking or drug use caused your health problems.
- Your family history shows significant health problems among relatives.
- You worked at other places where asbestos was a bigger problem.
- You have not been properly diagnosed by a medical professional.
- The petition was not filed correctly, even if it was filed on time.
- You were exposed to asbestos and other dangerous substances in your own home, not just at work.
- You do not have the authority to file a wrongful death lawsuit on behalf of the deceased.
- Your medical condition is not related to asbestos exposure.
Don’t take these allegations to heart; just let your attorney handle them. Defendants may also include a settlement request in their response, but this is rare. Companies may be willing to settle right away in order to avoid a lengthy and costly lawsuit. However, this first settlement offer may be very low. Expect to wait until closer to trial, or even during the trial itself, to receive a reasonable offer.
The first step in a successful filing process is choosing an attorney. If you decide to file a claim, your attorney will prepare and file the necessary documents to start your lawsuit. Your case will proceed more efficiently and you may have the greatest chance for compensation if you work with an experienced asbestos and mesothelioma attorney.
Why an Attorney is Important
If you worked for a large corporation that has closed or is bankrupt, funds may have been set aside to help pay medical and related expenses for mesothelioma patients. A mesothelioma attorney is knowledgeable about these funds and can help you file a claim. In addition, a mesothelioma attorney is familiar with asbestos manufacturers and can help you determine who is responsible for your suffering.
Because of its ability to resist high temperatures and corrosion, asbestos was an ideal material to use in the shipbuilding industry. Naval shipyard workers who served between World War II and the Korean War were frequently exposed to dangerous levels of asbestos, which increased their chances of developing mesothelioma and other asbestos-related illnesses. Many of these veterans have filed mesothelioma lawsuits to recover the costs associated with the diagnosis of these diseases.
Tacoma Dry Dock and Asbestos Lawsuits
Over the decades, Todd Pacific Shipyards, as owner of the Tacoma Dry Dock and later shipyards in the Tacoma area, has faced dozens of claims for injuries caused by asbestos. One case involved Gerald Black, a Washington state man who worked for Todd as a welder from 1942 through most of 1945. Black filed a claim under the longshore and harbor workers act (LHWCA), for asbestos-related injuries. Todd Shipyards argued that Black's later jobs, and not his shipyard work, probably caused Black's injury. A judge disagreed and ordered LHWCA payments to Black.
Gerald Black testified that the asbestos in the 1940s yard "was all over. You had to wallow in it to do your welding." Black reported that asbestos material was tossed around the shipyard "like snowballs," indicating the lack of safety measures taken in Todd shipyards.
Galveston Docks
One of the earliest cases occurred in 1984 when shipyard worker Guiseppe Castorina filed a lawsuit against Lykes Brothers Steamship Company "for injuries sustained as a result of exposure to asbestos." Castorina worked at the Galveston Docks from 1955 to 1984. The suit alleged that from 1965 to 1972, Castorina handled burlap bags that contained raw asbestos. In 1979, a doctor diagnosed Castorina with asbestosis, a respiratory disorder related to asbestos exposure. The court dismissed Castorina's claims because he could not show his injury occurred until after a 1972 maritime law revision went into effect. A 2009 case alleges a Galveston maritime worker contracted mesothelioma. Laura Bodin sued a number of companies that employed her late father, Pedro Perez, during the 1960s. The lawsuit claims Perez developed the disease while handling asbestos-containing products and that the companies used improper procedures to manufacture, transport and install the asbestos. Another case filed in 2009 claimed that a laborer at the Todd Pacific Shipyards facility in Galveston contracted asbestos-related breathing problems. According to the original claim, laborer Jesse Frederick Cruz "was required to handle products containing asbestos and was exposed to other asbestos products present in the workplace." Cruz died in 2002 at age 56. His relative, Mary Ann Sparkman, claimed that the company and other defendants did not follow federal regulations regarding the safe handling of asbestos.
Willamette Iron and Steel Works
Willamette Iron and Steel former employees filed multiple claims against the shipyard for on-the-job asbestos exposure that caused mesothelioma. One ex-worker, James McAllister, died in 2002 of mesothelioma after working for five years as a shipyard carpenter (1956-60). McAllister performed repairs on a number of U.S. Navy vessels, including destroyers.
In McAllister's case against a handful of companies, a federal court decided Willamette Iron and Steel couldn't simply wait and see if McAllister's widow proved that he had been exposed to asbestos. The court noted the extensive shipyard industry use of asbestos. This industry practice meant that it was the duty of companies to prove they had not used asbestos. McAllister won his claim, and his case was a significant reversal of years of ignoring the hazards of asbestos in American shipyards. McAllister later worked at Lockheed Shipyards in a similar capacity, but a federal court ruled that he was not exposed to asbestos while employed there. Another injured shipyard worker sued Willamette on his own, believing he had not received adequate representation from the union in his claim against the company for exposure. That also was a precedent-setting case because the former worker won on appeal, and the appellate court cited that asbestos would eventually be discovered as being unsafe at any level of exposure and those who created the exposure were liable for it.
Curtis Bay Coast Guard Yard
There is at least one known mesothelioma-related lawsuit involving the Curtis Bay Coast Guard Yard and asbestos exposure. In 2003, the estate of Harry Hunter sued Owens-Illinois Glass for providing Kaylo, an asbestos-containing insulation used at Curtis Bay. Hunter, who died from mesothelioma in 2001, had worked as an electrician at Curtis Bay for 33 days during the summer of 1956 while he was in college. The jury awarded Hunter's estate $4.2 million for his wrongful death. The amount was reduced to $600,000 because Maryland state law mandated a liability limit of $600,000.